Dispelling the Mathematical Misconceptions

Scattering the Mathematical Misconceptions You Can Do Math! Weve presumably completely been at an eatery with a gathering of individuals who need to pay separately, yet just one bill shows up. You at that point wind up in the situation of attempting to decide how much every individual owes. What occurs? You investigate the bill with a slight influx of frenzy at making sense of your aggregate, however rather, you state, Im no decent at math and you continue to pass it to the following individual who quickly reacts a similar way you did. In the long run and for the most part with some aversion, one individual takes responsibility for bill and computes the individual expenses or partitions the aggregate by the quantity of individuals at the table. Did you notice how rapidly individuals state that they were nothing but bad at math? Did anybody say, Im no decent at perusing? or on the other hand I cannot peruse? When and for what reason is it satisfactory in our general public to state were nothing but bad at math? Marry be humiliated to pronounce that were nothing but bad at perusing yet its very worthy in our general public to state that we cannot do math! In todays data age, science is required more than it at any point was previously - we need math! Critical thinking aptitudes are profoundly prized by businesses today. There is an expanding requirement for math and the initial step required is an adjustment in our mentalities and convictions about math. Perspectives and Misconceptions Do your encounters in math cause you tension? Have you been left with the feeling that math is troublesome and just a few people are acceptable at math? It is safe to say that you are one of those individuals who accept that you cannot do math, that youre missing that math quality? Do you have the feared ailment called Math Anxiety? Peruse on, now and again our school encounters leave us with an inappropriate impression about math. There are numerous confusions that persuade that lone a few people can do math. Its opportunity to disperse those regular fantasies. Everybody can be effective in math whenever gave chances to succeed, a receptive outlook and a conviction that one can do math. Valid or False: There is one approach to take care of an issue. Bogus: There are an assortment of approaches to take care of math issues and an assortment of instruments to help with the procedure. Think about the procedure you use when you attempt to decide what number of bits of pizza will 5 individuals will get with 2 and a half 6 cut pizzas. Some of you will picture the pizzas, some will include the all out number of cuts and partition by 5. Does anybody really compose the calculation? Not likely! There are an assortment of approaches to show up at the arrangement, and everybody utilizes their own learning style when tackling the issue. Valid or False: You need a math quality or strength of your left cerebrum to be effective at math. Bogus: Like perusing, most of individuals are brought into the world with the capacity to do math. Youngsters and grown-ups need to keep up an inspirational disposition and the conviction that they can do math. Math must be sustained with a strong learning condition that advances hazard taking and inventiveness, one that centers around critical thinking. Valid or False: Children dont gain proficiency with the nuts and bolts any longer in light of a dependence on number crunchers and PCs. Bogus: Research right now shows that adding machines don't negatively affect accomplishment. The number cruncher is a ground-breaking showing instrument when utilized fittingly. Most instructors center around the compelling utilization of an adding machine. Understudies are as yet required to realize what they have to enter into the adding machine to take care of the issue. Valid or False: You have to remember a ton of realities, rules, and recipes to be acceptable at math. Bogus False! As expressed before, theres more than one approach to take care of an issue. Remembering strategies isn't as compelling as reasonably getting ideas. For example, remembering the reality 9x9 isn't as significant as understanding that 9x9 is 9 gatherings of 9. Applying thinking aptitudes and inventive idea lead to a superior comprehension of math. Indications of comprehension incorporate those Aha minutes! The most significant part of learning math is understanding. Ask yourself subsequent to tackling a math issue: are you applying a progression of retained advances/strategies, or do you truly see how and why the system functions. (See page 2) Answer the inquiries: How would you know its right? Is there more than one approach to take care of this issue? At the point when addresses like this are replied, youre on your approach to improving as a math issue solver. Valid or False: Keep giving more drill and redundancy inquiries until youngsters get it! Bogus False, discover another approach to educate or clarify the idea. Very frequently, youngsters get worksheets with drill and reiteration, this solitary prompts needless excess and negative math mentalities! At the point when an idea isnt comprehended, its opportunity to discover another technique for instructing it. No new learning has ever happened because of redundancy and drill. Negative mentalities toward math are typically the consequence of abuse of worksheets. In rundown: Inspirational mentalities towards math are the initial step to progress. When does the most impressive adapting normally happen? At the point when one commits an error! In the event that you set aside the effort to examine where you turn out badly, you cannot help yet learn. Never feel gravely about creation botches in science. Cultural requirements have changed, in this manner math has changed. We are currently in a data age with innovation making ready. It is not, at this point enough to do calculations; that is the thing that adding machines and PCs are for. Math today requires choices about which keys to punch in and which chart to utilize, not how to build them! Math requires inventive critical thinking methods. Todays math requires genuine issues to tackle, an ability profoundly prized by bosses today. Math requires realizing when and how to utilize the instruments to aid the critical thinking process. This occurs as right on time as pre-kindergarten when kids look for counters, a math device, squares and an assortment of different manipulatives. Family inclusion is additionally basic in nurting a positive and hazard taking mentalities in math. The sooner this starts, the sooner one will turn out to be progressively effective in math. Math has never been progressively significant, innovation requests that we work more intelligent and have more grounded critical thinking abilities. Specialists propose that in the following 5-7 years there will be twice as much math as there is today. There are numerous motivations to learn math and its never past the point where it is possible to begin! Another dynamite procedure is to Learn From Your Mistakes Sometimes the most remarkable taking in originates from the errors you make.

Meteorologists Are Scientists Who Study the Weather

Meteorologists Are Scientists Who Study the Weather While the vast majority realize a meteorologist is an individual who is prepared in the air or climate sciences, many may not know that there is a whole other world to a meteorologists work than essentially guaging the climate. A meteorologist is an individual who has gotten specific training to utilize logical standards to clarify, comprehend, watch, and figure the earths environmental wonders and how this influences the earth and life on the planet. Weathercasters, then again, don't have specific instructive foundations and simply scatter climate data and gauges arranged by others. In spite of the fact that very few individuals do it, its somewhat simple toâ become a meteorologist you should simply gain a lone rangers, experts, or even doctorate in meteorology or in barometrical sciences. In the wake of finishing a degree in the field, meteorologists can apply to work for science look into focuses, news stations, and an assortment of other government occupations identified with climatology. Employments in the Field of Meteorology While meteorologists are notable for giving your gauges, this is just a single case of the employments that they do-they additionally give an account of the climate, get ready climate alerts, concentrate long haul climate designs, and even show others meteorology as educators. Communicate meteorologistsâ report the climate for TV, which is a famous profession decision as it is passage level, which implies you just need a Bachelors certificate to do it (or at times, no degree by any stretch of the imagination); then again, forecasters are answerable for planning and giving climate conjectures just as watches and alerts, to people in general. Climatologistsâ look at long haul climate examples and information to help evaluate past atmosphere and to anticipate future atmosphere patterns while look into meteorologists incorporate tempest chasers and tropical storm trackers and require a Masters certificate or a Ph.D. Research meteorologists by and large work for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the National Weather Service (NWS), or another administration organization. A few meteorologists, likeâ forensicâ orâ consulting meteorologists, are recruited for their aptitude in the field to support different experts. Scientific meteorologists explore claims for insurance agencies on past climate or research past climate conditions relating to legal disputes in a courtroom while counseling meteorologists are employed on by retailers, film teams, huge organizations, and other non-climate organizations to give climate direction on an assortment of tasks. All things considered, different meteorologists are more specialized. Incident Meteorologists work with firemen and crisis the board faculty by providingâ onsite climate support during rapidly spreading fires and other cataclysmic events whileâ tropicalâ meteorologists center around typhoons and storms. At last, those with an energy for meteorology and instruction can assist with making people in the future of meteorologists by turning into a meteorology educator or teacher. Pay rates and Compensation Meteorologist pay rates fluctuate contingent upon position (section level or experienced) and the business (government or private) yet regularly run from $31,000 to over $150,000 every year; most meteorologists working in the United States can hope to make $51,000 by and large. Meteorologists in the United States are frequently utilized by either the National Weather Service, which offers between 31 to 65 thousand dollars for every year; Rockwell Collins, which offers 64 to 129 thousand dollars for each year; or the U.S. Aviation based armed forces (USAF), which offers pay rates of 43 to 68 thousand yearly. There areâ many motivations to turn into a meteorologist, at the end of the day, chose to turn into a researcher who examines atmosphere and the climate should descend to your enthusiasm for the field-in the event that you love climate information, meteorology may be the perfect profession decision for you.

The Gift of Free Will - Literature Essay Samples

Dutch humanist and scholar Erasmus defines free will as â€Å"a power of the human will by which man may be able to direct himself towards or turn away from what leads to eternal salvation† (Erasmus 6). Many literary works of the Renaissance debate the roles of fate and free will in everyday life because determinism cannot be scientifically proven. Human beings cannot choose the family, culture, or economic situation that they are born into. But each action or decision that occurs from this point on is determined by free will, which is given freely by God. Free will differentiates mankind, or rational beings from animals. Humans have the capability to think, reason, and then make a conscious decision about how to act in response, therefore assuming responsibility for one’s actions and the subsequent consequences. Erasmus’ A Discussion or Discourse concerning Free Will is one of the many works of this time period which supports this theory, and uses examples in sc ripture to do so. William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, on the contrary, argues that the entire course of events that unfolds during the play is a result of determinism. However, even though Romeo and Juliet does argue that fate is omnipotent, it can also be interpreted that Shakespeare only includes the supreme power of fate in order to manipulate the play’s plot, suspense, and moral message since fate does not exist. Humans have the will to act freely, and both Erasmus’ and Shakespeare’s works can be seen as supporting the same side of the controversy between fate and free will, regardless of the author’s original intention. Free will is an aptitude given to humans by God. Erasmus adds that this gift also includes several kinds of grace. For example, grace that is naturally present within the human soul is possessed by all humans. Erasmus states that grace â€Å"remains even in those who persevere in sin; for they are free to speak or be silent; to sit or stand up; to help the needs, read the scriptures, or listen to a sermon† (Erasmus 9). Each individual has the ability to make a thoughtful and informed decision about each and every action. The second form of grace, or particular grace allows God to urge the sinner to repent but does not infuse the highest grace which â€Å"destroys sin and makes man acceptable to god† (Erasmus 10). Those who wish to achieve eternal salvation have the power to do so if they choose to act in a way that is morally and spiritually superior, allowing mankind to have control over their destiny. Erasmus also provides several examples from scripture to support the forms of grace and the presence of free will. God gives Adam and Eve the capability to choose whether or not to obey His commandments, which will result in either life of death (Gen. 2:17). Similarly, God tells Cain â€Å"If you do good, will you not receive? And if you do evil, your sin will immediately be at your door. But the desire for it will be within your control, and you will master it† (Gen. 4:6-7). In these instances, God teaches his followers about free will because it is a capability that each one possesses, which in turn determines their eternal salvation. Erasmus describes that â€Å"Scripture speaks of nothing but conversion, endeavor, and striving to improve† (14). Free will allows humans the capability to do so. The ability to improve in moral endeavors prevents complacency. If each aspect of human life was due to determinism, there would be no need for self-motivation or learning the morality of what is right and wrong. The presence of free will prevents God from being unjust and cruel, meaning each individual is responsible for each one of his or her actions which determines one’s posthumous destiny. On the contrary, William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet strives to eliminate the theme of free will and instead presents the role of fate in a straightforward yet unique way. Before the first act begins, the chorus delivers a prologue in the form of a sonnet that describes the feud between the Capulets and the Montagues in Verona. The chorus blatantly states â€Å"A pair of star-crossed lovers take their life,† revealing the ending of the tragedy before the play even begins (Shakespeare prologue.6). Shakespeare is unequivocally telling the audience that fate will bring two lovers together who will ultimately take their own lives. This frame narrative allows the audience to gain an omnipotent, god-like point of view in order to watch the tragedy unfold into what has been predetermined. Shakespeare’s stylistic choice to utilize an omniscient prologue allows the audience to recognize the many allusions to fate that are evident throughout the entirety of the play, re minding the audience that Romeo and Juliet’s tragic ending is still impending. Throughout the play, characters such as Romeo and Friar Lawrence think about the presence of determinism in his life quite frequently. Before Romeo attends the ball hosted by the Capulets, Romeo states that his â€Å"mind misgives / Some consequences yet hanging in the stars† (Shakespeare 1.4.113-14). Romeo has an inkling that something significant is predetermined to happen that night, continuing the theme that is established in the prologue. In the third act of the play, Romeo kills Tybalt in a duel and exclaims â€Å"O, I am Fortune’s fool!† (Shakespeare 3.1.142). This statement seems to suggest that fate is responsible for Tybalt’s death rather than Romeo’s own volition. In fact, Romeo is stating that he should not be held accountable for his violent actions since they are controlled by fate. This is a recurring theme throughout the play as Friar Lawrence also blames â€Å"Unhappy fortune!† when plans go awry, such as when the letter is n ot delivered to Romeo to inform him that Juliet is faking her own death in order for the two of them to meet again (Shakespeare 5.2.17). In the next scene when Juliet awakes from the deep slumber, Friar Lawrence breaks the news of Romeo’s death by saying â€Å"A greater power than we can contradict / Hath thwarted our intents† (Shakespeare 5.3.158-59). Even though Friar Lawrence marries the lovers in secret, gives Juliet a potion to help her fake her own death, and devises the plan for Romeo to sneak back into Verona after he has been exiled, he blames a higher power for letting the course of events happen as they do. Just like Romeo, Friar Lawrence does not assume any responsibility for the events that he is directly involved with or responsible for, exhibiting the notion that humans do not have control over their actions which are predetermined. The way that the characters in Romeo and Juliet view the role of fate as a supreme power differs greatly from Erasmus’ understanding of free will. Characters in Shakespeare’s play do not feel the need to take responsibility for their actions, especially when things go wrong. Depending on one’s interpretation, the dominance of fate in Romeo and Juliet can be seen as a stylistic feature employed by Shakespeare in order to succeed in communicating the moral of the story to the audience rather than the true force that is determining the characters’ actions. In each example of Romeo or Friar Lawrence blaming fate instead of their own actions, the plot can be continued without the characters needing to place blame for the tragic events that unfold. When addressing the families, the prince states that â€Å"heaven finds means to kill your joys with love †¦ All are punished† (Shakespeare 5.3.303-305). As a result of the feud between the Capulets and th e Montagues, both families lose a young kinsman, displaying that only destruction can arise from hate. Shakespeare uses the heavy presence of fate as a method to express the more significant message which governs the course of events throughout the play. Shakespeare also uses the authority of fate in Romeo and Juliet to utilize dramatic irony which creates suspense for the audience. Curiosity is naturally provoked when it is stated that the two young lovers will take their own lives. The utilization of a chorus creates a frame narrative that allows Shakespeare to use fate in a seemingly logical way to ensure that the ending will happen as it is promised in the beginning, without the characters’ awareness. For example, Juliet foreshadows her own death and Romeo’s as well. Juliet asks her nurse to find out who Romeo is and states â€Å"If he be marrià ¨d, / My grave is like to be my wedding bed,† which ultimately does happen (Shakespeare 1.5.148-49). Subsequently, Juliet foreshadows Romeo’s death when she states: O God, I have an ill-divining soul! Methinks I see thee, now thou art so low, As one dead in the bottom of a tomb. Either my eyesight fails or thou lookest pale. (Shakespeare 3.5.54-57) Juliet is f oreshadowing how she will see Romeo in the Capulets’ tomb after he takes his own life. Both of these examples perpetuate dramatic irony as the audience knows that these statements have additional meanings about Romeo and Juliet’s deaths, which increases suspense. In addition to conveying the plot and message of the work, Shakespeare also uses the role of fate as a superficial force to keep the audience entertained, and not as an existent higher power that eliminates the characters’ capabilities to act on their own free will. Humans have the developed capability to make a choice about each and every action, and to understand the consequences of those actions, even though Romeo and Friar Lawrence would disagree in order to escape self-loathing. Fate does not exist when man can think and make a choice. God is just and Erasmus’ A Discussion or Discourse concerning Free Will proves the existence of free will through countless examples that are in Scripture. William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet on the contrary, holds the fate accountable for the characters’ actions and the deaths of Romeo and Juliet since this is what the chorus in the prologue states. In actuality, this can be seen as a mere literary technique employed by Shakespeare in order to continue the storyline without characters blaming one another, invoke dramatic and tragic irony to keep the audience in a state of suspense, and convey the moral of the story which expresses the destruction that is brought about by hatred. Both works by Erasmus and Shakespeare demonstrate that all individuals have free will and control over their actions because God gave mankind the ability to do so.

The Crucible By John Proctor - 968 Words

Choose three of the characters in The crucible and show how Miller presents the motivations for their actions. Think about: Reputation- is this a motivating factor for any of the characters Power – Which characters are motivated by power Witchcraft – how are the accusations used? Who benefits? How? The individual and the society – how might the particular community situation in Salem be a motivating factor for some characters? 800 – 1250 words The theme of the crucible is a tragedy. In the crucible characters are motivated by various themes such as, reputation, power, witchcraft and society. John Proctor, Reverend Hale and Reverend Parris’s actions are prime examples of how in the crucible these themes motivate character’s actions From the very start of the text we can see that reputation is a key factor throughout the text, the first time this is noticed is at the very beginning, act one, in which Reverend Parris’s daughter is sick, however this particular detail does not show the key reputation, it is the fact that he had found betty dancing in the woods with various other girls dancing aswell, atleast one of them were naked. This event could prove betty practising witchcraft, and the cause for betty to fall ill, it is revealed to use that he is ashamed calling witchcraft in the â€Å"holy† town of salem, let alone his own household, he states that he has â€Å"enemies† that if they find out this information would crush him w ith it. In addition to this at the end of the play afterShow MoreRelatedThe Crucible By John Proctor895 Words   |  4 PagesJohn Proctor, a prominent individual in both the Salem Witch Trials and The Crucible, was tried and executed for witchcraft in 1692. When the witchcraft hysteria first began in Salem village in the winter of 1692, Proctor became an outspoken opponent of the trials and stated to many that the afflicted girls, who had been accusing many of the villagers of witchcraft, were frauds and liars (Brooks). There were many parallels between John Proctor and his character in The Crucible, including his vocalRead MoreThe Crucible By John Proctor849 Words   |  4 Pages The Crucible Analysis: Is John Proctor a tragic hero based on Aristotle`s definition of a tragic hero An array of Aristotelian tragic heroes can be found throughout American literature. One of which includes John Proctor, main character farmer in mid-30s, from Arthur Miller s play, The Crucible. Yet, in order for him to obtain such a title he must possess specific characteristics. Five of which include possession of hubris, a flaw or decision leading to desire for revenge, a reversal of goodRead MoreThe Crucible By John Proctor1091 Words   |  5 PagesJohn Proctor, a character in Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, was hung for â€Å"witchcraft.† Owen Lattimore’s, a former editor for the Institute of Pacific Relations Journal, reputation was tarnished after falsely being accused by Joseph McCarthy of being the number one spy for the Soviets. David Kato, a Ugandan gay rights campaigner, was beaten to death on January 26, 2011. These are just three examples of how witch hunts ruined and ended lives. Throughout history, many people have been persecutedRead MoreThe Crucible By John Proctor1134 Words   |  5 PagesIn The Crucible, Abigail Williams, John Proctor, and Elizabeth Proctor are arguably the most important characters. The affair between Abigail and John drives the plot of the play. Abigail begins accusing societal outcasts as witches and gradually works her way up the social ladder until she is able to accuse an upstanding citizen like Elizabeth Proctor of being a witch and having people believe the accusation. She accused Elizabeth of being a witch so that Elizabeth would be hanged. Then, AbigailRead MoreJohn Proctor In The Crucible Essay783 Words   |  4 PagesIn â€Å"The Crucible,† a play by Arthur Miller about the Salem Witch Trials, we are shown the roles and fates of various characters, one of which is the farmer John Proctor. Throughout the play, John Proctor is shown to be an honest albeit hotheaded and stubborn man as he crusades to disprove the claims of witchcraft against his wife and other townsfolk. John Proctor best shows his honesty within â€Å"The Crucible† when he repeatedly admits to both his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, and the court about his relationsRead MoreExamples Of John Proctor In The Crucible712 Words   |  3 Pages The Crucible John Proctor shows himself to be a very powerful and charismatic person right. From the time he first appears in Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible, he is presented as an intelligent, sharp-tongued man with a strong independent mind. These traits would seem to make him a good person to question the motives of those who cry witchcraft. However, his guilt over his affair with Abigail makes his position problematic because he is guilty of the very hypocrisy that he despises in others.Read MoreExamples Of John Proctor In The Crucible985 Words   |  4 Pages John Proctor; Tragic Hero or Ordinary Joe Plays have been used as a method of storytelling and form of entertainment for hundreds of years. A tragedy is one type of play where the audience pities the characters and fear the same consequences that the characters face. In addition, tragedies often include a tragic hero who has a tragic flaw causing his or her downfall. One example of a play that is a tragedy and includes a tragic hero is the The Crucible. John Proctor in The Crucible is a true tragicRead MoreThe Role Of John Proctor In The Crucible1242 Words   |  5 PagesMiller Arthur’s play â€Å"The Crucible† takes place in Salem, the event of this play is about the witch trials. These witch trials had many different reactions and results, it influenced people in many different ways. The trials broke the whole village into different sides of their view of the trials, people get accused of being a witch or studying/practicing witchcraft and their trial could come with many different consequences. The trial would either lock up or hang those who are accusedRead MoreThe Importance Of Common Core Standards1114 Words   |  5 Pagessituation. In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible; the character of John Proctor is an honorable man despite having committed wrongful acts. He was able to redeem himself through acts that is considered courageous, such as when he refuses to contribute to the lie of witchcraft in Salem, when he fights for the people who were convicted of witchcraft and when he regrets being a dishonest man. John Proctor showed his good nature many times throughout the play. In the last act, John Proctor refused to confess to theRead MoreThe Importance Of Common Core Standards1114 Words   |  5 Pagessituation. In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible; the character of John Proctor is an honorable man despite having committed wrongful acts. He was able to redeem himself through acts that is considered courageous, such as when he refuses to contribute to the lie of witchcraft in Salem, when he fights for the people who were convicted of witchcraft and when he regrets being a dishonest man. John Proctor showed his good nature many times throughout the play. In the last act, John Proctor refused to confess to the

Biological, Psychodynamic, Behavioral and Cognitive...

Excuse or Explanation? When the news report flashes across the television informing millions around the world of the murder of a family of six, it is obvious that the initiate reaction of the civilians would be terror and hatred. This hatred, a fierce, in-tolerant force behind these people that would instantly choose the worst for whomever the suspect may be. Often, this is the reaction of the people whereas there are a few of those individuals who may decide to view this case differently. These would be psychologists. A psychologist may approach this story with a view inside of the perpetrators mind. Was he biologically, psychodynamicly, behaviorally or cognitively provoked to do such a thing? What would make someone do something†¦show more content†¦A behavioral psychologist will say that this murder took place because it is what the murderer was taught to do and what he learned. This psychologist will not focus on what they think or feel, it is simply based on what they d o. A behavioral psychologists may even say that this killer could be taught to do differently and that killing is not acceptable. We also have the cognitive psychologists approach. By definition, cognitive means knowing. Therefore, cognitive psychologists try to figure out what is going on in an individuals mind that may lead them to their behavior. Sometimes, scientific equipment is used in order to fully understand the reactions and thoughts that are going on in a person’s mind. Here, a cognitive psychologist may look at this murderer and view his actions as a chemical reaction that went wrong in his or her brain. Also they may see this perpetrators actions as something he or she took in and had to release and the way he or she released it was through the violent act of murder. For example, this suspect may have been harassed and threatened himself and in order to release the fear, he or she committed a terrible crime. Cognitive psychology is completely interested in what people think and from that point, what they choose to or not to do. Being only a few views of psychology there seems to be many explanations for what people do. The reasons they abuse their children or loved ones, why they are alcoholics or in this case whyShow MoreRelatedPerspectives of Psychology1141 Words   |  5 PagesPerspectives of Psychology Psychology can be defined as the systematic study of mental processes, couple with behaviors, and experiences (Kalat, 2011). There are many ways in examining, mental processes and behaviors among people, and therefore psychologist uses different perspectives to understand how human beings, think, act, and behave. Some psychologist uses one perspective to analyze behaviors, and other uses a multidimensional approach. Carter Seifert (2013) identified 7 major perspectivesRead MorePerspectives in the Realm of Psychology Essay examples1793 Words   |  8 PagesPsychology explores human behavior and the human mental process figuring ways to improve the thinking and attitude of an individual’s existence. Sometimes, different techniques are used and tried to properly resolve the problem within the multitude of possible behavioral issues. Moreover, Sigmund Freud, an Austrian neurologist, developed many theories, psychodynamic therapy, for clinically treating people with mental health problems through their unconscious mind; Then, Sigmund Freud’s theoriesRead MorePsychology : Theory Of Psychology1637 Words   |  7 PagesIntroduction to Psychology Module 1. Explain how a person committed to each of the following contemporary perspectives would explain human aggression. a. Psychodynamic: A person committed to psychodynamics would see that human functions are based on the interaction of drives and forces within the unconscious mind of a person. This influences different structures of the personality of the person as well. In addition, a person that is committed to psychodynamics would believe that the fundamentalRead MorePsychodynamic Approach On Human Nature1108 Words   |  5 Pagesnumerous issues; however, there is no one way to approach the matter. Recently, I completed a Determine your Theoretical Approach inventory. During this inventory, I was asked multiple questions that would determine my approach with dealing with human nature. There are four categories of theoretical approaches for counseling. The four categories are: psychodynamic, cognitive- behavioral, existential- humanistic, and postmodern approach. â€Å"Psychodynamic approach sees human functioning based upon the interactionRead MoreThe Question in the Origins of Psychology is W hat Drives Us and Why722 Words   |  3 Pageswas considered as its own scientific discipline. Psychology began in 1879 when a man named Wilhelm Wundt set up a psychology laboratory in Leipzig, Germany. This laboratory would be considered the birth place of experimental psychology. Within the laboratory, Wundt independently trained over 180 students. Over 100 of these students came from other countries, and then returned to their native countries with the knowledge of experimental psychology. Of the one-hundred, Edward Titchener returned toRead MoreAbnormal Psychology Therapy1729 Words   |  7 PagesAbnormal Psychology and Therapy Paper (NAME HERE) PSY 300 July 2, 2010 Abnormal Psychology and Therapy Upon researching what the word psychology means many definitions may be found. However, once all those definitions have been deciphered you will find that psychology is the study of an individual’s mental and emotional state and thought processes. The intention of therapy within psychology is to diagnose, treat, and in time help individuals improve from whatever psychological infirmityRead MoreThe Contribution of Different Approaches to Psychology for the Development of Modern Psychology1147 Words   |  5 Pages Psychology is a vast field which consists of theories and approaches where it involves certain assumptions on human behavior. How they function and the aspects of the behavior that needs to be studied, in addition to the research methods that are needed to be followed in order to understand it thoroughly. These approaches provide characteristic viewpoints and emphasize different factors. These approaches have contributed towards the development of modern psyc hology in various ways. Read MoreThe Biological Model Of Mental Illness1356 Words   |  6 Pagesclinically significant behavioral or psychological syndrome or pattern that occurs in an individual and involves changes in thinking, emotion, behavior, interpersonal interactions, daily functioning, or a combination. The causes of mental illness are complex and vary depending on the theories associated to the different biological, psychological, and environmental factors. The etiology of mental illness is based on five broad models: biological, psychological, behavioral, cognitive, and social. TheRead MoreLifespan Development : Cognitive, And Personal And Social Development1717 Words   |  7 PagesLifespan Psychology Introduction Lifespan Development is the field of study that examines patterns, modes of growth, change, and stability in behavior that occur throughout the entire lifespan of an individual. There are so many things to keep in mind about Lifespan Psychology; 1. Lifespan Psychology is a scientific, developmental approach that focuses on human development. 2. Scientists who study the lifespan know that neither heredity nor environment alone can account for the full range of humanRead MoreHuman Behavior And Inner Emotion1329 Words   |  6 Pagesbehavior and motivation: these perspectives are (but not limited to) the biological, social-cultural, cognitive, developmental, psychodynamic, and behavioral perspectives. These approaches helps psychologists and individuals further their understanding of social behavior and inner emotion. In psychology, a biological perspective is imperative to understanding the brain and behavior. Biological psychology refers to the biological study of animals and humans, as well as the function of their immune system

Lady Macbeth

Lady Macbeth- good or bad Essay In this essay I am going to talk about Lady Macbeth and whether she was a good or bad person. This is a very contentious argument. There are many obvious reasons as to why we could see Lady Macbeth was a bad person such as she was involved in the murder of King Duncan. However, she repented for what she did and felt very guilty about it which could show that she changed to become a good person. In Act 1 Scene 5 Lady Macbeth reads a letter from her husband detailing the encounter with the witches and how they said that he would be thane of Cawdor and then king and Banquo would be a father of a line of kings. She immediately resolves to have Duncan killed to fulfill the prophecy. A messenger brings news of the kings imminent arrival. Macbeth appears and they begin to plot the assassination of the king. By reading and analyzing this scene I think that Lady Macbeth was very power-hungry and she would do anything to get what she wanted. She was overly-ambitious. She knew that Macbeth would not agree as she says, Yet do I fear thy nature. It is full of the milk of human kindness so she tried to think of ways to persuade him to go through with it. She said to him that if he did not kill Duncan he would not be a man. This suggests that she was very possessive and controlling and manipulative over her husband. It also suggests that Macbeth was a very loyal and valiant man but Lady Macbeth made him bad. She then starts talking to god and the spirits asking them to make her more man-like. She says things like, Come to my womans breasts, and take my milk for gall , Come, you spirits that tend on mortal thoughts unsex me here , Come thick night, and pall thee in the dunnest smoke of hell etc. this shows that she was preparing herself to do something evil. When Macbeth came back she tells him to kill Duncan in order to get the crown. She says, Only look up to clear. To alter favour ever is to fear. Leave all the rest up to me. which proves that she was the one who came up with the idea of the murder and she was more involved in it than Macbeth was. And in the movie she was the one that killed Duncan, not Macbeth. So looking at theses points I believe that Lady Macbeth was evil in this scene. However some people do not agree. They think that it was Macbeths idea and he is the one who sent the letter and she just responded. Also, she was a very good and supportive wife towards her husband and she wanted him to be king and so she helped him do this. She isnt bad, she is just ambitious. And it was also the witches fault as they are the ones who started all of this and they are the ones who told Macbeth about the prophecies and encouraged him. The body language she uses in this scene are quite strong and powerful which shows that she was ready to do anything. In Act 2 Scene 2 Lady Macbeth waits in the courtyard for her husband. A shaken Macbeth appears and informs her that he has done the deed. She is horrified to discover that her husband did not leave the bloody daggers at the murder scene and he refuse to go back to Duncans chamber. As Lady Macbeth leaves to return the daggers, a loud knocking is heard. When she rejoins Macbeth, they retire to their bedchamber to make it appear that they had been sleeping. After analyzing this scene I think that Lady Macbeth was also evil in this scene. This is because she was not afraid of killing Duncan or ashamed although Macbeth was. .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be , .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be .postImageUrl , .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be , .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be:hover , .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be:visited , .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be:active { border:0!important; } .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be:active , .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u12d18ed01e72d5a68a4cfaba2f9fc5be:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: How was Tension and Drama created in the Heck-Tate scene of "To Kill A Mockingbird"? EssayWhen Macbeth had come back with the daggers she said Give me the daggers in quite a forceful tone which indicates that she does not care about the blood. She also says if he do bleed, ill gild the faces of the grooms withal which suggests that she was not scared or worried and was quite confident. When she comes back she says my hands are of your colour which implies that she was proud to have the blood on her hand. However, some people may say that this line was used as a form of support to her husband to show that he was not alone. Her body language also suggested that she was quite confident as she did not look worried and she didnt think twice before going back into Duncans room. In Act 5 Scene 1 Lady Macbeth has been observed sleep-walking and talking for several nights. A doctor has been summoned by her attendant to observe her nightly ritual. Lady Macbeth appears and in her sleep-walking state, she reveals details of the murders for which she and Macbeth have been responsible. Both the doctor and the gentlewoman are shocked by what they witness. The doctor realizes there is nothing he can do to help and advises that a careful watch be placed on Lady Macbeth. I analyzed this scene and have concluded that she was also evil in this scene as she was not sleep-walking because of guilt; she was sleep-walking because of paranoia. She was also feeling nervous and she feared that someone might find out what she did. She says things like, I tell you yet again, Banquos buried. He cannot come out on his grave. and what need we fear who knows it, when none can call our power to account. to reassure herself that no one will find out. Eventually, in later scenes, the paranoia manages to kill her. However, there is some evidence that she was feeling guilty and she repented what she did as she says out, damned spot! Out, I say! This could be representing the tiny spot of guilt that she has that she can not get rid of. In this scene Lady Macbeth is less confident and controlling and power-hungry and is more sympathetic and paranoid. Her body language also tells us that she was paranoid and nervous as when she walked she was very cautious and quite jumpy. There are many reasons on both sides of the argument. She could be seen as a good person because she was a good and supportive wife who was just a bit over-ambitious. It wasnt really her fault; the witches are the ones that encouraged them. And near the end she started to feel guilty about what she did and repented it and she killed herself because of the guilt. However she could also be seen as a bad person because she was the one that convinced her husband to kill the king and at that time killing the king was a very big sin.

Justice Whats the Right Thing to Do

Introduction â€Å"Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do?† is a book that discusses the theory of justice and the diverse ways in which it is perceived by different people in the society. The author, Michael Sandel, tries to force the reader to look into the circumstances that happen in real life and allows them to make the decisions on the right thing to do.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Sandel pushes his readers into tracking their personal moral obligations by laying a series of challenges based on everyday situations, which help them make the best resolutions on the right actions to take. In this essay, the first five chapters of the book are reviewed based on the main concepts. Chapter review In Chapter 1, titled â€Å"doing the right thing†, three cases are presented. Case one concern the laws prohibiting g auging of prices. Precisely, it refers to the price changes that came into effect subsequent to the Florida’s Hurricane Charley. As clarified by Sandel, the arguments in support to and in contrast to price-gauging laws are based on three concepts: well-being, liberty and virtue. He then discusses about who is eligible for the â€Å"Purple Heart†. In determining this, people need to know precisely which qualities are necessary to deserve this honor. The final case is regarding the latest bailout that came after the financial crisis. Specifically, he discusses about the feelings of different people towards the bonuses awarded to the executives of the companies involved. Even though some felt that the bonuses were justified, most individuals thought it was unfair primarily because they compensated failure rather than success. The author describes three conceptions of justice that aids in understanding how decisions are made and he discusses them all through the book. Util itarianism, also described as capitalization on welfare, is the first conception. This is followed by another conception regarding liberty and personal rights. The last conception discusses the idea that justice is associated with virtue and a decent life in general. Before recounting the various concepts of justice, Sandel also discusses what are described as the moral dilemmas. These can be clarified by applying ethics in the reasoning process, which directs every individual in different ways dependent on their characters and the manner in which they deliberate and justify their decisions. In this case, clashes may result from partial reasoning or contradictory moral obligations.Advertising Looking for essay on political sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Chapter two, labeled â€Å"The Greatest Happiness Principle or Utilitarianism†, deliberates over the idea of utilitarianism by relating two various attitudes. First is the idea of Jeremy Bentham. The idea concentrates on getting maximum pleasure and lessening pain so as to make the most out of the overall utility. In this notion, the rights of a person may be disregarded, like in the incident of torture. The idea of John Stuart Mill presents the second concept of utilitarianism. According to Mill, people are at liberty in doing whatever they need to as long as it does not cause any damage to others. In addition, he is argues that there are superior and inferior pleasures (Sandel, 2010). Chapter three, â€Å"Do We Own Ourselves or Libertarianism†, argues that there should be minimal supervision and every individual should have the freedom of choosing the right action to take in different situations. According Sandel, libertarians are against authoritarianism, moral regulation and redeployment of income. For instance, libertarianism opponents claim that tax system is necessary since everybody needs to contribute towards the welfare of the society. Similarly, they argue that wealthy persons need to give back part of their riches since it was generated by the society. The author then deliberates on the implications associated with purchasing and retailing of organs. Sandel then reflects on the market and moralities and ways in which an open market may be founded on either sovereignty or wellbeing. In chapter four, â€Å"markets and morals†, Sandel talks about the morals of forfeiting persons to do various kinds of work, like fighting in wars and giving birth to children. The debate is whether there is need for market, where currency is involved, to the feature of morals. The best example presented by the author in this section is â€Å"remuneration for pregnancy†. Deliberating through the moralities and injustices in this instance aids in clarifying the variations amongst the leading philosophies of justice. In his opinion, it is not necessary for an individual to demand pay for certain services be cause of morals.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Chapter five, â€Å"What Matters is the Motive†, the author draws the attention of the reader towards understanding why motive is necessary. He does this by explaining the idea of Kant. He argues that morality concerns with respect to people, regardless of who they are. This involves doing the correct thing simply because it is right. Sandel then argues for the idea of egalitarianism based on the perception of John Rawls. Similarly, he clarifies how it is different from the concept of libertarianism and utilitarianism. According to Rawl, people need fairness with regard to fundamental freedoms and societal and financial life. Reference Sandel, M. J. (2010). Justice: What’s the right thing to do?. London: Penguin Books. This essay on Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? was written and submitted by user Lexie Pate to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.